In addition to Nobel Laureate William Faulkner, the Faulkner Society's namesake, the competition is named for literary scholar and collector William B. Wisdom of New Orleans,shown at right, who amassed a significant collection of memorabilia related to William Faulkner. His collection is housed today in the Library of Tulane University.
Mr. Wisdom's daughter, New Orleans philanthropist
Adelaide Wisdom Benjamin was among the earliest supporters and Advisory Council members of the Faulkner Society. She was an instigator in the creation of the competition and underwrote the first prize for Best Novel.
Later, Mrs. Benjamin created the poetry prize and underwrote it for several years. She was a trustee of The Mary Freeman Wisdom Foundation, which has been a long time supporter of the competition, Mrs. Benjamin was among the first to receive the Society's ALIHOT (A Legend in Her/His Own Time) Award for community service and philanthropy.
A competitive talent search open to all writing in English, the William Faulkner - William Wisdom Creative Writing Competition is for previously unpublished work. Self-published and print-on-demand books are considered published. Books, stories, essays previously published in their entirety on the Internet are considered published. Collections are not accepted in any category.
Entries are accepted now in eight categories: Novel, Novella, book-length Narrative Non-Fiction, Novel-in-Progress, Short Story, Essay, Poetry, and Short Story by a High School Student.
Overall goals of the competition are to seek out new, talented writers and assist them in finding literary agents and, ultimately, publishers for their work.
2013's opening date was January 1, 2013. The final deadline was May 15, 2013. Winners will be notified on William Faulkner's birthday, September 25, and presented publicly at the Society's gala annual meeting, Faulkner for All, this year on December 7.
The 2014 competition will open on January 1. Do not send 2014 entries before that date.
For 2014's competition guidelines, CLICK HERE! For 2014 entry form, CLICK HERE!
Please review your work carefully prior to entering. Some of our judges traditionally are well known literary agents and editors who take a dim view of sloppy editing. Our general guideline for both pre-round and final judges is "ready for publication."
SOME TIPS ON EDITING YOUR MANUSCRIPTS
1. Spell Check. Some entries we receive obviously have never been run through Spell Check. Spell Check is just a beginning, however, as it is impossible for Spell Check to catch such errors as "where" instead of "were" or "there" instead of "their" or incorrect spellings of names. Once you have used Spell Check a couple of times, do it again.
2. Third Party Editing. After you have spell-checked, then have two or three educated readers, people you trust, read the copy for typos, grammatical mistakes. Then Spell Check again, as mistakes often are made while correcting mistakes. We do not correct your manuscripts prior to submitting for judging.
3. Bad Phrasing. During Words & Music, 2012, literary editor Brenda Copeland of St. Martin's conducted a self-editing workshop and warned writers to beware of such over-worked, often unnecessary phrases "There is," "There are," "There was," which can lend a trite quality to a manuscript. For instance, you might replace "There was a time when Mary Shannon O'Brien would have hesitated to confront the church hierarchy about child abuse..." with "Until Sean was ruined by that dirty priest, Mary Shannon O'Brien might have hesitated to confront the Church hierarchy. Not now."
4. Over-used words. One novel manuscript entered last year—which was a good concept but too long—used the word "the" 10,001 times. At least half could easily have been eliminated. For instance, "Marylin stood outside of the room and listened to the
cacaphony of querulous voices in the room. When she entered the room, the quarreling ended abruptly."
Use instead, for instance, "Outside, Marylin listened as ranting voices reached crescendo level. Then, she entered and raving was replaced by a still angry silence." More dramatic, six fewer words. Obviously, there are occasions when "The" is necessary for emphasis, e. g., The Help. "The" is, however, the most overused word in the language and especially overused for titles, chapter headings. For instance, Atonement is a great title, while The Atonement would have been trite. Sweet Tooth is a terrific title. The Sweet Tooth would be less compelling. (Atonement and Sweet Tooth are critically acclaimed novels by Ian McEwan.)
Watch Your Titles. Competition judges and, utlimately, editors and agents, are confronted with titles as their first impression of a manuscript's worth. One mistake writers make frequently with the titles they choose is to plaguerize a title from another work of art, such as selecting Heard It On The Grapevine, which is a direct steal from the hit song of that name. There may be a reason in the writer's mind for using such a title but it indicates a lack of imagination to a reader not yet privy to the contents of the manuscript.
6. Other Important First Impressions. Professional readers, such as agents and literary editors frequently read the first couple of chapters and the ending before deciding whether they want to invest more time in a manuscript. They know that readers looking for a new book to read frequently do the same thing. So, concentrate especially on strong openings and endings. A weak opening means a manuscript will not meet our general guideline of "ready for publication." Ditto, a poorly constructed ending to a story.
7. Imagination Versus Reality. There are perfectly marvelous stories based in reality and perfectly marvelous stories totally imagined. If your setting is imaginary, you can name a street and locate it within your imaginary city or town however you like. If your story is set in a real city or town, however, making up streets or having them run the wrong way or in the wrong part of the city are no-nos. Getting facts wrong about an historic incident or personage is another egregious error.
8. Dialogue. A majority of the manuscripts we reject are product of a poor command of dialogue, with characters uttering phrases which are either pretentious, pompous or
simplistic to the point of boredom. And, talk about overworked phrases, too many of
the manuscripts could have their word counts significantly reduced by elimination of
unnecessary instances of "he said" and "she said."
9. Characters and Voice. A common failing in manuscripts which are rejected in our competition is the lack of a compelling central character and/or lackluster secondary characters. Take a close look at your characters. Is there a strong reason for a reader to take the time to become embroiled with your characters? Get a reaction to your characters from several third party readers. If these readers don't "love" your characters, go back to work. Select a voice approach and be consistent. If switching from the voice of "all-seeing , all-knowing God" to the "ordinary mortal," a difficult task to achieve successfully,
make it clear that a switch has occurred so the reader is not confused and does not lose
the storyline. If first-person voice is the approach selected, then make certain that voice can pull the reader into your story. If the central character is sufficiently compelling, his/her voice can carry a storyline.
10. Setting the Scene. If you are writing a scene set in a place you personally have never visited or a time before your own, your research had better be first class. Nothing is more disturbing to a reader than realizing that the author does not know what he/she is talking about. Beyond the simple fact of accuracy, however, is the writers's job to conjure a scene so vivid that the reader feels transported. Too many manuscripts we received are more like
first drafts of TV screenplays, which could not possibly transport without accompanying visuals and audio.
These are just a few tips on basic editing to help you with your entries. We
suggest you have a professional editor look at your work prior to entering if possible.
2012 WINNERS, RUNNERS-UP, FINALISTS
2012 winners were formally presented at the annual meeting of the Faulkner Society, Faulkner for All! during Words & Music, a Literary Feast in New Orleans, November 28 - December 2. 2013 winners will be presented at Faulkner for All, tentatively scheduled for November 23 during Words & Music.
To review winners selected by 2012 by final round judges, Click Here!
Their work will be published in the 2013 edition of The Double Dealer. We expect nowto go live with the 2011 edition—yes, it is taking a long time—of the new on-line journal before June 1. That edition of the journal will featuer 2010 winners and the papers presented in 2010. Shortly, thereafter, we expect to post the 2012 edition, featuring winners of 2011. That edition also will be a "catch-up" edition and will feature winning work from 2007, 2008, and 2009. And in the fall, we will post the 2013 edition with 2012 winners and the papers presented during Words & Music, 2012. Thereafter, we expect to publish each fall, before or concurrent with Words & Music. We had planned to encompass work of winners from 2007-2010 in a single edition, as the last hard copy of The Double Dealer was published in 2007, before 2007 winners and runners-up were announced. The book simply got to be too big, however.
2011 COMPETITION WINNERS
Winners of 2011 competition were presented at Words & Music, 2011 at the annual meeting of the Faulkner Society on November 11, 2011. They represent the best of an extraordinary year of entries, one of the best groups of entries since the competition was created in 1992. To see a complete listing of winners, runners-up, and finalists for the 2011 competition,
To see a complete listing of others who placed in the 2011 competition, Click Here!